Amazing work, a cartoon mashup that brings poor Donald Duck on a trippy trek through Glenn Beck nuttiness.
from Rebellious Pixels
whatever has my attention at the moment
Amazing work, a cartoon mashup that brings poor Donald Duck on a trippy trek through Glenn Beck nuttiness.
from Rebellious Pixels
If you live in central NJ/Somerset County here’s an easy way to help provide a happy Thanksgiving for your neighbors. Download this flyer and mail your $40 donation (enough to provide a Thanksgiving dinner for a family of four) directly to the food bank nearest you. You can even specify if you want the donation to help a family in your own town.
If you don’t live in Somerset County I encourage you to seek out your local food bank and give what you can.
Please share this.
My dog, being a dog.
The Good Wife was my favorite new drama last season. I understood Alicia’s bouncy ambivalence.
This season starts with some of that ambivalence (temporarily) removed. Thanks to a deleted voicemail, as far as she’s concerned she and Will are over and done- unless Kalinda convinces her to push the door back open. But you can feel the power shift, and Alicia kinda likes it. Now, as far as she’s concerned, she tossed Will aside and it’s up to her whether she’ll pick him back up again. But I think the real point was of the deleted voicemail, in which Will firmly placed the ball in Alicia’s court anyway, was to emphasize that Eli’s going to stop at nothing to get Peter re-elected.
New merger-partner Derrick Bond puts himself forward as an innovator, as a “man of the people” (the people = staff.) But he didn’t seem all too upset that he was forced to settle for an office with windows… and did he consult with Will before announcing to Alicia that he’s her new mentor? I smell political aspirations, do you? (Of course you do.)
Other new guy Blake (played by the guy who played Jason Street on Friday Night Lights) is here to make things interesting – and not in a good way – for Kalinda. So Kalinda- pushes him? As in gives him a shove? Really?
Cary on the other side of the courtroom is even more predictable than Cary in competition at the firm was. Hope they fix that. This week’s case wasn’t as interesting in and of itself as others have been, but it let us see how Alicia is and will be used by just about everyone around her because of Peter.
And finally, the bathroom scene. Peter and Alicia seem most at ease when they put everything else aside and just ride the hormones.
(spoilers if you haven’t see Episode 10 yet…)
Don dodged another one, and this was probably the closest call he’s had since he was in Korea.
He probably shouldn’t have spilled to Faye. I don’t doubt she wants to help him but I do think in the process she’ll make things worse.
Pete continues to surprise me, the way he turns bad situations around. Pete decides that the fallout from Don’s exposure will hurt the firm far more than losing a $4 million account will- even when it’s his baby. Pete will save SCDP…
… even as Roger is running it down. How much damage will he do in those thirty days Lee gave him?
What was up with Don calling Betty “sweetie” on the phone, and the utter lack of jealous scowl on Betty’s face when Don told Sally he was taking her to see The Beatles? (But oh how I loved Sally’s reaction to the news!) Then Betty doesn’t hesitate to keep Don’s secret. Not only is she still in love with him, she’s starting to fall back in like with him.
After the waiting room conversation, what do you think Joan did? See ya in 8 months, baby.
Lane- dude, you’re way too old to be playing the “shock daddy” game, and daddy’s having none of it.
And in the end… bullet dodged, Beatles tickets in hand, Don eyeballs Megan, cockiness back in full effect…
Oh, Don.
Just some messing around- one of these days I’ll get him to let me record/post something real.
Three new dramas premiered last night. I watched The Event and Hawaii 5-0 live, and Lone Star online this afternoon (I love that I can catch episodes I miss online- although it looks like Lone Star is only available today.)
As Hawaii 5-O began I thought it was some war movie that was running late on the schedule. I grew only slightly less confused as the show went on.
I like the device that allows them to get away with blatantly illegal acts. What kind of cops are they? “We’re the new kind.”
McGarrett and Danno feel more like Starsky & Hutch than the original McGarrett and Danno, and I really loved Starsky & Hutch, so that’s a good thing. It’s not really a destination show, but it’s a fun one. And, of course, the theme music is really good :).
Lone Star was… ok. The characters didn’t grab me, the whole father/son struggle thing has been done, and done, the suspicious in-laws thing as been done, and done, And the juggling two women thing? Just not feeling this one.
The Event freaked me out just enough (creepy music behind little unsuspecting kids always gets me.) But not so much that I had nightmares. I wasn’t enthralled with the way the show jumped around, and the repeated scenes.
I enjoyed the scenes with Blair Underwood as President Martinez more than the scenes with Jason Ritter whining about his missing girlfriend. I fast-forwarded through some parts, although I’m sure at some point those scenes will matter and I’ll be missing some key plot point.
But the climax was very, very cool. I’m hooked.
Because grandma and grandpa are just too stupid to figure out all this new-fangled digital crap: “It’s just so confusing!”
Is it just me? Is insulting the intelligence of your potential customer really a good marketing technique?
MST3K-style take on A New Jersey, a film by the Republican Governor’s Association about Chris Christie, from Brian Donahue at nj.com.
American flag- DRINK!
| Christie Science Theater 2012 on Ledger Live |
My ability to concentrate on the task at hand has been deteriorating for some time now (which should be obvious if you only read the title of this site.) I grew into a bad habit of idle web surfing, which can easily masquerade as productivity (especially if I’m surfing around web design sites, freelance sites, productivity sites, in the interest of research… ) but of course it’s really not.
Trying to reverse this trend, awhile back I moved my “office” out of my bedroom and into our den. Our family PC is in here as well, and the room is doorless, opening out to our dining room and the rest of the house. The counter-intuitive idea was that real life going on around me would pull me away from online distractions, and I’d be forced to focus more when I actually sit down to work. The lack of a door has been an issue at times, especially when I need to talk on the phone, but all things considered this has worked out pretty well. I’m also feeling less isolated.
I have a chunk of time when the rest of the family is at work/school to get the concentration heavy stuff done, and because I know this time is limited I’m less likely to wander off into “research” that doesn’t directly have anything to do with the task at hand.
So things are better, but could be better still. And as I’ve thought about this I’ve realized that I’m routinely pulling my brain off the rails by glancing over to my left. To my left is a second monitor. I’ve been using two monitors for over three years now, beginning when I replaced my PC with a MacBook and attached it to a full size monitor. The idea, of course, is that I can have more screen real estate for all the visual elements I’m working with. But when I really, really think about it, the second screen rarely serves a purpose other than “home for Tweetdeck.” When I glance to my left, it’s to read up on Twitter.
Now, some (you?) may say just don’t run Tweetdeck all day. Yes, that could be a solution, but I do get great value from Twitter so I’m simply not willing to take such a drastic step (you could say if not for Twitter I wouldn’t be in business.)
So instead I’m going to try going back to one monitor. My current computer is a 24″ iMac so it’s not like I’ll be suffering for screen space. That plus using the Spaces feature which in effect gives me as many monitors as I could possibly want means I won’t really be downgrading. I’ll run twitter on a hidden Space, get the benefits of having it run all day, but not be so easily distracted by it as I am when it’s always there, to my left.
It’s another little change that could hopefully have a big impact. And my second monitor already has a new purpose, to replace the just-died one that was attached to my old MacBook, which is being used as a second family machine. Happy solution all around, I hope!
I live in a small town but we lost 2 residents and a number of friends and family members in the 9/11/01 attack on the World Trade Center. We have a small memorial to them installed in a local park; this is from yesterday’s ceremony.
My feelings on memorials such as this are mixed. I understand the need for them, especially for those who lost loved ones, and I have the same emotional response as everyone else each September (especially when the weather is the same cloudless blue it was that day nine years ago.)
But I honestly think it’s time to focus on the continuation of life. Stop allowing fear and anger to get in the way of rational discussion. Honor those lost by living our lives proud of the freedoms we have, and work on expanding those freedoms to everyone within our own nation, instead of fighting over who is worthy of them.
I don’t know what set this guy off, but I’m really glad he doesn’t live in New Jersey.
Edited to add follow up from NPR.
My parents use Facebook, mostly to stay in touch with family. I think my dad (74 today!) was disappointed to find so few old friends there, but their demographic is growing!

[Infographic by Assisted Living Facilities].
Found via my friend Adele.
(a bit ironic that I was just asked to do a presentation on just this topic but can’t due to scheduling- this will have to suffice ;).)
With the latest upgrade the iPhone camera now captures the bright and the dark. Check out these shots, with & without HDR mode engaged. Nice.
I came across this well-written post from Jolie O’Dell: Why We Don’t Need More Women In Tech… Yet.
This dubiously accurate nomenclature of “women in tech” places the entry-level PR girl at a startup in the same monolithic group as 50-year-old engineer at IBM. This is unfair to the women who do real technology work; it’s doubly unfair to women as a gender, as it smashes the “tech” label onto anything related to the Internet. Does having 50 male engineers and 50 PR women at tech companies mean we’ve acheived gender equality? Hardly, but it does make it more difficult to correct the true imbalance: There are not enough women doing real technology work…
…We are misguided to demand more women in tech when there simply isn’t an adequate supply of competent technological professionals to support gender parity. Women in tech begins with little girls playing with science- and math-related toys, and it takes much longer than just a few months or a few years to undo the sociological mores of a few millenia.
(the bold is mine)
I really, really thought we’d be further along by now. When my older kids were little (15-20 years ago) “it” was all about boys with dolls and girls with trucks, which I admit I never fully bought into.But then instead the pink aisle at Toys R Us grew into 3 aisles, the Legos became warring “Bionicles,” special video games were developed for girls (it was assumed all other games were for boys.)
No wonder girls don’t pursue tech careers, and it’s such a loss to us. Women approach and solve problems differently than men (gross generalization, but I believe it to be the case) and with greater access to and interest in tech at a young age who knows what could be unleashed? I hope more young voices like O’Dell speak up.
Go read the rest of Jolie’s post.
One of the more crazy ideas coming from the far right is this idea of “anchor babies,” that illegal immigrants are crossing the border to give birth in the US, so that 21 years in the future they can start the process of becoming citizens themselves, or worse, infiltrate the USA with citizen terrorist babies.
Apparently this woman’s sister has visual proof of this.
Quote begins at 12:05 (sorry I couldn’t just grab the snippet):
I’m sure there are woman who intentionally give birth to their children in the US so they are citizens, but doubt that they are plotting anything beyond a hope for a better education and opportunity for their kids. How we should deal with that is where the discussion should be, and this nutty anchor baby idea just sends it all right off the rails.
Infographic by College Scholarships.org
via The Student Loans Scheme: a Gateway Drug to Debt Slavery.
Have you ever noticed this? I guess it’s a testament to Jon Hamm’s acting skills, but it’s pretty easy to tell when Don Draper is slipping back into being Dick Whitman. His smile is childlike and shy, and he uses both sides of his mouth. When Don Draper smiles, it’s guarded, and smirky.
Here we see Don/Dick as Dick at Anna’s house, where he’s obviously most comfortable (this of course is before he and Anna’s sister had their argument- Don tried to be Don but he was cut down and back to being Dick by the time he walked back into the house.) See his smile? Sweet, happy, relaxed, no attitude.

Now here’s Dick/Don as Don. This is about as big a smile as we get from Mr. Draper. Just a little sideways smirk. Unless he’s drunk.

I really noticed that in last week’s episode, as a very drunk & happy Clio-winning Don leans into the Life Cereal guys and spits out one bad idea after another. That was Dick Whitman talking, not Don Draper. More evidence? The waitress he woke up with two days later calls him Dick, much to his own surprise.
Watch Don Draper’s smile over the next few episodes of Mad Men, I think we’ll see more of the child-like and lost Dick Whitman appearing in Don’s carefully crafted but tearing-at-the-seams persona. Unless he stops drinking. As if that’s gonna happen.
(images via AMC)
Subscribe via RSS or email:
I used to blog at banannie (2007-2010) and What Struck Me (2003-2007.)
I've been creating websites since 1996.
I occasionally steal from myself and post reruns from the past here.
...my rules. Comments are moderated to the extent that I find necessary. Thank you for respecting that.
This is an example of a widgeted area.
This is an example of a widgeted area.
© 2009-2012 Annie Boccio - (just another) distraction